The fine folks at Fujifilm USA loaned me an XF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS lens to use for about thirty days. This is not a sponsored review, and Fujifilm has not had any input or seen this
The Fujinon XF 80mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR ($1199USD) is a relatively large and heavy lens due to its high-quality construction. It is both larger (130mm long versus 106mm) and heavier (750 grams
One pair of lenses that bare consideration for many getting into the Fujifilm X system are the “kit” XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4 R LM OIS and the “professional” XF 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR. Let’s
'Generally the Fujinon XF 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR performs roughly according to its lens class thus you may argue that this is Okay. However, the provided quality is not in sync with its price tag. Honestly, the word "bizarre" comes into mind here'. On this site I never read such a bad review of any other Fuji lens:
Fujifilm lens reviews. Sigma 10-18mm f2.8 DC DN review; Fujifilm XF 8mm f3.5 review so far; Sigma 23mm f1.4 DC DN review; Tamron 150-500mm f5-6.7 Di III VC review; Fujifilm XF 23mm f1.4 R LM WR review; Fujifilm XF 33mm f1.4 R LM WR review; Fujifilm XF 18mm f1.4 review; Viltrox AF 85mm f1.8 II review; Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f4-5.6 review so far
I should also mention the more reasonably priced Fujifilm XF 10-24mm f/4 R OIS WR, at $999.00, which probably would be my favorite in this field, albeit at double the cost of the Laowa 9mm. The ability to zoom, and have autofocus, weather-sealing, and optical image stabilization would be worth the extra cost to me.
LefhQ. 7hhx87n5hg.pages.dev/2417hhx87n5hg.pages.dev/1717hhx87n5hg.pages.dev/1897hhx87n5hg.pages.dev/1427hhx87n5hg.pages.dev/1267hhx87n5hg.pages.dev/2487hhx87n5hg.pages.dev/697hhx87n5hg.pages.dev/1757hhx87n5hg.pages.dev/152
fujifilm xf 10 24mm f4 r ois wr lens review
